#CASE CLICKER CODES DECEMBER 2017 CODE#

IR 7: In April, a student in the College of Arts and Sciences took an IR for cheating by copying assignments from a previous semester. IR 6: In April, a student in the College of Arts and Sciences submitted an Informed Retraction for cheating by copying previous semester’s homework assignments. IR 5: In April, a student in the College of Arts and Sciences submitted an Informed Retraction for posting homework assignments online. IR 4: In March, a student submitted an Informed Retraction for cheating by accessing blackboard during a final exam. IR 3: In February, a student submitted an Informed Retraction for plagiarizing portions of a case study in ARCH 7210. IR 2: In January, a student in the College of Arts and Sciences submitted an Informed Retraction for cheating on a midterm exam, two reading assignments, and lying to a professor. IR 1: In January, a student in the College of Arts and Sciences submitted an Informed Retraction for publishing answers to multiple homework assignments on an online forum. (forthcoming) Public Summaries from January 1, 2018 to DecemConscientious Retractions IR 13: In December, a student in the McIntire School of Commerce submitted an Informed Retraction for cheating on a midterm and then lying about the type of cheating that occurred. IR 12: In December, a student in the McIntire School of Commerce submitted an Informed Retraction for cheating on a midterm and then lying about the type of cheating that occurred. IR 11: In November, a student in the College of Arts & Sciences submitted an Informed Retraction for using unauthorized collaboration on a paper. IR 10: In November, a student in the College of Arts & Sciences submitted an Informed Retraction for using unauthorized aid on multiple assignments in the same class and then lying to the professor about it. IR 9: In November, a student in the College of Arts & Sciences submitted an Informed Retraction for using unauthorized aid on multiple assingments in the same class and then lying to the professor about it. IR 8: In October, a degree recipient from the School of Engineering and Applied Science submitted an Informed Retraction for cheating on multiple assignments. IR 7: In October, a student in the College of Arts & Sciences submitted an Informed Retraction for copying on a midterm. IR 6: In September, a degree recipient from the School of Engineering and Applied Science submitted an Informed Retraction for cheating on multiple assignments by collaborating with another student and lying about whether the collaboration occurred. IR 5: In September, a student in the School of Engineering and Applied Science submitted an Informed Retraction for cheating on multiple assignments by collaborating with another student and lying about whether the collaboration occurred. IR 4: In August, a student submitted an Informed Retraction for stealing from her place of employment.

IR 3: In February, a student in the Curry School of Education and Human Development submitted an Informed Retraction for collaborating with another student on a final exam. IR 2: In February, a student in the Curry School of Education and Human Development submitted an Informed Retraction for collaborating with another student on a final exam.

#CASE CLICKER CODES DECEMBER 2017 CODE#

IR 1: In February, a student submitted an Informed Retraction for cheating by copying other students' code on multiple assignments. A student must then take a two-semester leave of absence from the University. An IR is predicated on a student taking responsibility for the commission of an Honor Offense and making amends with all affected parties. The Informed Retraction (IR) permits a student to atone for his or her mistakes after an Honor Report has been made. A valid and complete CR involves the admission of a possible Honor Offense before the student has reason to believe that such offense has come under suspicion by anyone. The Honor System permits a student to atone for his or her mistakes by filing a Conscientious Retraction (CR). Public Summaries from January 1, 2019 to DecemConscientious Retractions All public summaries are meant to be gender-neutral. The male pronoun is used only for consistency. Each case reported to the Honor Committee is judged independently on the specific facts of that case at each stage of the adjudicative process.

Per the Honor Committee’s By-laws, Public Summaries are not relevant evidence at Honor hearings. These summaries are in no way meant or permitted to be used as a system of precedent, binding or otherwise. These public summaries are meant to better inform the University student body about the workings of the Honor System in regard to the major issues brought forth at Honor hearings.

Case clicker codes december 2017